Ten years on from the last post and I'm thinking about starting up writing this book again. I'm planning to do NaNoWriMo again this year and thought it would be good to revisit TWH.
I've written a lot for other books in other NaNo years - Emerald Fire once and The Talisman three times. Seems only right to give it another go using my original idea,
I've got three weeks to plan and then a month to write.
We'll see how it goes this time...
Sunday, October 08, 2017
Thursday, October 04, 2007
Heroes and Heroines
I'm putting Historical Fiction (the course) behind me and moving on to something new this week...
Heroes and Heroines (Sixteen Master Archetypes)
The premise is that all heroes and heroines in books, on TV and in films can be fitted into one of 16 archetypes. The author of the course-book is very definite that they are not stereotypes and that the boundaries are wide.
Heroes
CHIEF - Don Corleone in The Godfather and Darcy in Pride and Prejudice
BAD BOY - Patrick Swayze in Dirty Dancing and Huckleberry Finn
BEST FRIEND - Christopher Robin in Winnie the Pooh and James Stewart in It's A Wonderful Life
CHARMER - Bill Murrey in Ghostbusters and Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew
LOST SOUL - Mel Gibson in Lethal Weapon and Heathcliffe in Wuthering Heights
PROFESSOR - Frasier Crane and Harry Potter
SWASHBUCKLER - Zorro and Peter Pan
WARRIOR - Superman and Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird
Heroines
BOSS - Boadicea (Boudicca) and Lucy in the Peanuts comic strip
SEDUCTRESS - Lolita and Cleopatra
SPUNKY KID - Lois Lane and Little Orphan Annie
FREE SPIRIT - Emma in Emma and Ariel in The Little Mermaid
WAIF - Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz and Ingrid Berman in Casablanca
LIBRARIAN - Miss Marple and Dana Scully
CRUSADER - Ellen Ripley in Alien and Jane Eyre
NURTURER - Mary Poppins and Deanna Troi in Star Trek:TNG
She says that characters aren't necessarily confined to these. Some are layered with more than one archetype, and some will evolve from one to another in the course of the story.
My first Lesson is to decide which Archetype my hero is, and describe him a little. I'm thinking he will be a Bad Boy :-D
Heroes and Heroines (Sixteen Master Archetypes)
The premise is that all heroes and heroines in books, on TV and in films can be fitted into one of 16 archetypes. The author of the course-book is very definite that they are not stereotypes and that the boundaries are wide.
Heroes
CHIEF - Don Corleone in The Godfather and Darcy in Pride and Prejudice
BAD BOY - Patrick Swayze in Dirty Dancing and Huckleberry Finn
BEST FRIEND - Christopher Robin in Winnie the Pooh and James Stewart in It's A Wonderful Life
CHARMER - Bill Murrey in Ghostbusters and Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew
LOST SOUL - Mel Gibson in Lethal Weapon and Heathcliffe in Wuthering Heights
PROFESSOR - Frasier Crane and Harry Potter
SWASHBUCKLER - Zorro and Peter Pan
WARRIOR - Superman and Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird
Heroines
BOSS - Boadicea (Boudicca) and Lucy in the Peanuts comic strip
SEDUCTRESS - Lolita and Cleopatra
SPUNKY KID - Lois Lane and Little Orphan Annie
FREE SPIRIT - Emma in Emma and Ariel in The Little Mermaid
WAIF - Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz and Ingrid Berman in Casablanca
LIBRARIAN - Miss Marple and Dana Scully
CRUSADER - Ellen Ripley in Alien and Jane Eyre
NURTURER - Mary Poppins and Deanna Troi in Star Trek:TNG
She says that characters aren't necessarily confined to these. Some are layered with more than one archetype, and some will evolve from one to another in the course of the story.
My first Lesson is to decide which Archetype my hero is, and describe him a little. I'm thinking he will be a Bad Boy :-D
Monday, September 10, 2007
Feeling better.....
She's not replied to my last comment but I've posted some 'Final Thoughts' on leaving the class.
* * * *
Thanks for the various feedback you've all given me - it's been interesting and thought-provoking.
It concerned me that you feel that to write those specific scenes was pathological. I discussed it with a friend of mine who is a children's author and one of the points he made is that history can be ugly and sometimes it's necessary to reflect that.
The scenes I have written are set in the correct era and based on contemporary accounts. These scenes are not set in the present nor the future and I believe that to write about this subject and not reflect what actually happened does a great disservice to the thousands of people who were subjected to it.
I am not talking here about whether an individual wishes to read about this, or indeed any other subject. This is purely a statement on writing about it.
Would you feel the same if my story was set in the concentration camps of World War II, or indeed The Killing Fields in Cambodia (see Lesson 3).
I don't know if you'll be able to come back here to read this, but I felt I needed to say it.
Thanks for your time
* * * *
She may not come back to read it, or post a response, but I feel better!!
Thanks for the various feedback you've all given me - it's been interesting and thought-provoking.
It concerned me that you feel that to write those specific scenes was pathological. I discussed it with a friend of mine who is a children's author and one of the points he made is that history can be ugly and sometimes it's necessary to reflect that.
The scenes I have written are set in the correct era and based on contemporary accounts. These scenes are not set in the present nor the future and I believe that to write about this subject and not reflect what actually happened does a great disservice to the thousands of people who were subjected to it.
I am not talking here about whether an individual wishes to read about this, or indeed any other subject. This is purely a statement on writing about it.
Would you feel the same if my story was set in the concentration camps of World War II, or indeed The Killing Fields in Cambodia (see Lesson 3).
I don't know if you'll be able to come back here to read this, but I felt I needed to say it.
Thanks for your time
She may not come back to read it, or post a response, but I feel better!!
Wednesday, September 05, 2007
Discouraged...
Someone told me I was mentally disturbed yesterday. Or at least implied it.
I'm doing a course on Historical Fiction and had written briefly in one of my assignments that there was some torture in the Prologue of my novel. I feel this is completely justified because Rachel is accused of witchcraft therefore she is subjected to some of the tests they used at the time - ducking, sleep deprivation, use of a witch-pricker to see if there was an area of her body that did not feel pain or bleed.
The person posted in her first feedback that she would never read a book again with torture in it, which is completely understandable. She said she wanted the books she reads to be heart-warming and uplifting, and I can totally understand that. She also said that they should be inspiring. I replied back saying I agreed but I felt that or a book to be inspiring then the protagonist needs to work through various trials and tribulations and come through the other side.
I said that I hoped my book would have an inspiring ending but the Prologue wouldn't as it ends with Rachel's death. I gave a very brief description of the things Rachel would go through first and asked if (but only if she felt able to) she would give me her feelings on whether the actions were too disturbing, but not a problem if she would rather not read it.
I think it's a valid thing to know if what I write disturbs people because I don't want that to happen, but I don't want to disturb someone in the process.
She replied back that she wouldn't read it (fair enough) and that she felt that to put stuff like that out there was pathological. I checked the definition on Dictionary.com and it says:
Pathological - caused by or evidencing a mentally disturbed condition
I've posted back that I didn't feel that I was mentally disturbed but not had a reply yet.
I know she's completely entitled to her point of view, and not everybody wants to read that type of thing, or gory murders, or soppy romances. I don't think some of the people in my church would be that impressed that the book I'm writing has ghosts and witchcraft in it.
I'm surprised how much it actually upset me that she said that. I don't have a problem with someone saying they don't like my style, my ability, or the subject matter.
But to say I was mentally disturbed for writing about it felt hurtful. I even cried, which is pathetic.
I'd better get used to it, I guess. Time to start growing a thicker skin.
I'm doing a course on Historical Fiction and had written briefly in one of my assignments that there was some torture in the Prologue of my novel. I feel this is completely justified because Rachel is accused of witchcraft therefore she is subjected to some of the tests they used at the time - ducking, sleep deprivation, use of a witch-pricker to see if there was an area of her body that did not feel pain or bleed.
The person posted in her first feedback that she would never read a book again with torture in it, which is completely understandable. She said she wanted the books she reads to be heart-warming and uplifting, and I can totally understand that. She also said that they should be inspiring. I replied back saying I agreed but I felt that or a book to be inspiring then the protagonist needs to work through various trials and tribulations and come through the other side.
I said that I hoped my book would have an inspiring ending but the Prologue wouldn't as it ends with Rachel's death. I gave a very brief description of the things Rachel would go through first and asked if (but only if she felt able to) she would give me her feelings on whether the actions were too disturbing, but not a problem if she would rather not read it.
I think it's a valid thing to know if what I write disturbs people because I don't want that to happen, but I don't want to disturb someone in the process.
She replied back that she wouldn't read it (fair enough) and that she felt that to put stuff like that out there was pathological. I checked the definition on Dictionary.com and it says:
Pathological - caused by or evidencing a mentally disturbed condition
I've posted back that I didn't feel that I was mentally disturbed but not had a reply yet.
I know she's completely entitled to her point of view, and not everybody wants to read that type of thing, or gory murders, or soppy romances. I don't think some of the people in my church would be that impressed that the book I'm writing has ghosts and witchcraft in it.
I'm surprised how much it actually upset me that she said that. I don't have a problem with someone saying they don't like my style, my ability, or the subject matter.
But to say I was mentally disturbed for writing about it felt hurtful. I even cried, which is pathetic.
I'd better get used to it, I guess. Time to start growing a thicker skin.
Friday, August 10, 2007
Plotting the Plot - Lesson One
This is part of Lesson One. I'm not posting more because if I ever do finish this book I don't want to spoil the story for anyone who reads it :-)
In no more than 5 sentences, describe your story idea
My protagonist, Annie, finds out she's adopted and discovers that one of her ancestors (Rachel) was burnt as a witch in a small village in 1689, cursing the man responsible as she died.
Annie and her young daughter move from the city to her grandmother's cottage in the village where the man's malevolent ghost begins to haunt them and their new friends.
What is your main character's strong point?
Belief in the power of love for her family. This is what finally breaks the curse and defeats the ghost.
What is your main character's fatal flaw?
Acts rashly and instinctively without thinking of what the consequences of her actions might be. This is part of the reason that the first ceremony fails which leads to... ;-)
I'm enjoying getting back into writing again, and getting new ideas for my book.
In no more than 5 sentences, describe your story idea
My protagonist, Annie, finds out she's adopted and discovers that one of her ancestors (Rachel) was burnt as a witch in a small village in 1689, cursing the man responsible as she died.
Annie and her young daughter move from the city to her grandmother's cottage in the village where the man's malevolent ghost begins to haunt them and their new friends.
What is your main character's strong point?
Belief in the power of love for her family. This is what finally breaks the curse and defeats the ghost.
What is your main character's fatal flaw?
Acts rashly and instinctively without thinking of what the consequences of her actions might be. This is part of the reason that the first ceremony fails which leads to... ;-)
I'm enjoying getting back into writing again, and getting new ideas for my book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)